With the use of whiteboards in schools it is great to examine the effect of these characteristics. There is a debate as to whether students’ performance on standardized tests increases or not. Out of studies carried out in other regions and the UK from 2003 whether the boards are used it appeared that there was significant gains as students benefited from their teachers experience with the whiteboards.To understand the full Extents of the different factors were considered including the age of the pupils, length of exposure to the whiteboards, sex, special needs and other groupings. From the research conclusions are drawn. When the students are exposed to the whiteboards for a long run it turns into an instrument that is mediating involving the interactions and among the pupils themselves. This sort of mediation increases the productivity that is displayed by advancement in exam scores.
The studies also showed that this technology contributes to each stage of the learning procedure in addition to gains across all areas. Gains that were different have been shown by studies conducted on subjects. In math as an example were able to maximize their performance. Performance improved to high reaching levels for many women and for boys in the average.In English all Students irrespective of their sex showed improved performance. There were no negative effects from the use of the IWB. This demonstrates that technology is capable of bringing life which makes it more pleasurable for the student. The lessons become more enjoyable but also beneficial. Although there is a clear sign that interactive whiteboards have a favorable effect to learning, this technology was confronted by criticism. For example people have claimed that although the new technologies were welcomed by pupils there was no effect on performance in the initial decades.
This was attributed to aspects such as teachers focusing on the technology instead of the learning demands of the pupils. There is also a prospect of activities due to the interactivity. Interactivity that is merely a process is experienced in classes. Another source of criticism is that just seven percent of the teachers received instruction on how best to use the technology. This is likely to slow down the integration process of the devices in schools.There are certain Institutions that fail to buy of the necessary accessories to the whiteboard. Although these accessories appear to be minor but they are necessary. Schools realize their error a month or two following the unit is purchase. Some of the Fabrica de lousa digital include connection for more easy transport of USB speaker’s information and wall mounting to clamp the unit in the visible area of the room. Failure leads to poor performance becoming a source of criticism.